Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Dalibor Svrcina vs Hamad Medjedovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Svrcina vs Medjedovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Dalibor Svrcina vs Hamad Medjedovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Svrcina 1 - 0 Medjedovic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Svrcina has won 44.34% of points on his second serve, while Medjedovic has won 53.25%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Svrcina, in recent form, has won 54.86% of his opponent's second serve points, while Medjedovic has won 52.04%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.15% and 31.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Svrcina has saved 56.13% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Medjedovic has saved 60.91% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Svrcina has won 51.85% of matches played (W/L 28/ 26), with Medjedovic winning 66% (W/L 33/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Svrcina has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 13/ 7), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Medjedovic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 71% (W/L 5/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 12/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Svrcina has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 24/ 20), where as Medjedovic has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 10/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Svrcina winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Svrcina winning 2 and Medjedovic winning 0. The last match between Svrcina and Medjedovic was at the Prostejov Challenger, 02-06-2022, Quarterfinals, Clay with Dalibor Svrcina getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:49.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Svrcina and Medjedovic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Svrcina winning 0 times and Medjedovic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Svrcina winning 0, and Medjedovic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Svrcina has played against opponents with an average rank of 299.41 while Medjedovic has played against players with an average rank of 222.78.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Svrcina has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Medjedovic has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Svrcina has converted 44.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Medjedovic has converted 41.04% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
192
Rank
154
High
21
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
135
Rank
102
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
56% (133-104)
Career Total W/L
63% (117-69)
53% (10-9)
YTD W/L
67% (12-6)
$333,295
Career Prize Money
$435,660
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Svrcina VS Medjedovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Dalibor Svrcina | Hamad Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:49 | 1:21:49 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (37/61) | 52% (32/62) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (26/37) | 63% (20/32) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (11/24) | 30% (9/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (33/62) | 39% (24/61) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Svrcina VS Medjedovic H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Dalibor Svrcina | Hamad Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (10/9) | 67% (12/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (24/24) | 63% (27/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (226/224) | 54% (222/189) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 79% (11/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.07 | 0.74 |
| Aces Total | 16 | 149 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 58 | 54 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:32 | 1:38:56 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 330.42 | 192 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (997/1412) | 62% (788/1265) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (623/997) | 72% (570/788) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (184/415) | 53% (254/477) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (71/160) | 41% (55/134) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (626/1444) | 40% (522/1304) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 67% (4/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 78% (7/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 54% (7/6) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (9/17) | 71% (12/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 83% (5/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 82% (11/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 18% (11/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (11/3) | 43% (7/3) |
Dalibor Svrcina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Dalibor Svrcina
67%
(
71 of
106)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
104)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
39 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
112
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Omar Jasika
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Dalibor Svrcina
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
83%
(
52 of
63)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 4-6 7-6(2) 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Oriol Roca Batalla
Player
Dalibor Svrcina
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Dalibor Svrcina
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(2) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Bernard Tomic
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
21 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Dalibor Svrcina
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 5-7 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Philip Sekulic
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hamad Medjedovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
56%
(
70 of
124)
1st Serve %
61%
(
81 of
132)
13
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
50 of
81)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
43%
(
9 of
21)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
46 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
63 of
132)
141
Total Points Won
115
|
6-2 6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Filip Krajinovic
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Lucas Pouille
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
12
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
10
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Alexei Popyrin
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
9
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Jeff Wolf
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Laurent Lokoli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Svrcina Vs Medjedovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
